FEMINIST EPISTEMOLOGIES AND PEDAGOGIES
Ed. St. 6622-001
Autumn 2000
| Audrey Thompson |
University of Utah
|
| Class meets in 106 BuC |
Tu 4:30 - 7:30
|
|
|
| Office: 308C M.B.H. |
Off. hrs: Tu, Th 3:00-4:30 & by appt.
|
| Voicemail: (801) 587-7803 |
Receptionist: (801) 587-7814
|
| Fax: (801) 587-7801 |
Mailbox: 307 M.B.H.
|
| email: |
|
Course Description
The purpose of this course is to explore feminist epistemologies and their
relation to pedagogy. In mainstream, “universal” epistemologies, dichotomies
such as that between reason and emotion and that between the public and
private spheres serve to legitimate claims regarding objectivity. In problematizing
(or rejecting) such dichotomies, feminist approaches to knowledge problematize
traditional claims to knowledge. Although the course will focus primarily
on feminist standpoint theories, it will also look at post-structural and
liberal feminist epistemologies. Among the questions we will examine will
be those concerning objectivity, relational knowledge, situated knowledge,
and feminist pedagogy.
Required Texts:
-
Patricia Hill Collins, Fighting Words: Black Women and the Search for
Justice (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998).
-
Ann Garry and Marilyn Pearsall, eds., Women, Knowledge, and Reality:
Explorations in Feminist Philosophy, 2nd ed. (New York: Routledge,
1996).
-
Dorothy E. Smith, The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology
(Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1987).
-
Charlotte Perkins Gilman, The Yellow Wallpaper (New York:
Dover, orig. 1892).
-
Electronic readings packet available at the Marriott Reserve Desk
Copies of the required books are on reserve at the Marriott University
Library and are available for purchase at the University Bookstore. The
readings packet is available electronically at the Marriott University
Library Reserve Desk.
Course Requirements
Requirements for the course are regular attendance and participation; two
short papers; and a longer final paper. Attendance and participation represent
15% of the grade; the first short paper represents 20% of the grade; the
second short paper (together with the biography handout) represents 25%
of the grade; and the final paper is 40% of the grade for the course.
The two short papers are to focus on an assigned theme
in the readings. For the final paper, students will be asked to address
the implications of feminist epistemology for feminist pedagogy. While
the short papers will focus on three or four readings, the final paper
is expected to draw on a much wider distribution of readings. The final
paper should be about 12-15 pages in length. All papers are to be typed,
double-spaced, and have one-inch margins (for comments). References should
be in the format that the student would be most likely to use in a published
paper or a thesis.
SCHEDULE
Week 1 Introduction: Gender Socialization
Theorists’ View of Classroom Dynamics
29 Aug.
-
Myra Pollack Sadker and David Miller Sadker, “Sexism in Teacher Education
Texts,” Harvard Educational Review 50, no. 1 (February 1980): 36-46.
-
Sheila Tobias and Carol Weissbrod, “Anxiety and Mathematics: An Update,”
Harvard
Educational Review 50, no. 1 (February 1980): 63-70.
Large Group Activity: Deconstructing films
Small Group Activity: Deconstructing textbooks
Handouts: Deconstructing textbooks, Deconstructing
yearbooks
Week 2 Gender Difference Theorists’
Views of Morality and Education
5 Sept.
-
Susan Glaspell, “A Jury of Her Peers,” in Images of Women in Literature,
ed. Mary Anne Fergusun (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1973), pp. 370-85.
-
Carol Gilligan, “Moral Orientation and Moral Development,” in Women
and Moral Theory, ed. Eva Feder Kittay and Diana T. Meyers (Savage,
MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1987), 19-33.
-
Carol Gilligan, “In a Different Voice: Women’s Conceptions of the Self
and of Morality,”
Harvard Educational Review 47, no. 4 (November,
1977): 481-517.
-
Betty Bardige, “Things so Finely Human: Moral Sensibilities at Risk in
Adolescence,” in
Mapping the Moral Domain: A Contribution of Women’s
Thinking to Psychological Theory and Education, ed. Carol Gilligan,
Janie Victoria Ward, and Jill McLean Taylor, with Betty Bardige (Cambridge:
Harvard University Press, 1988), 87-110.
Week 3 The Construction of Knowledge as a Feminist
Project
12 Sept.
-
Marilyn Frye, “The Possibility of Feminist Theory,” in Garry and Pearsall,
eds., Women, Knowledge, and Reality
-
bell hooks, “Choosing the Margin as a Space of Radical Openness,” in Garry
and Pearsall, eds., Women, Knowledge, and Reality
-
Patricia Hill Collins, “The Social Construction of Black Feminist Thought,”
in Garry and Pearsall, eds., Women, Knowledge, and Reality
-
Angela Davis, “Blame It on the Blues: Bessie Smith, Gertrude ‘Ma’
Rainey, and the Politics of Blues Protest,” in Blues Legacies and Black
Feminism: Gertrude “Ma” Rainey, Bessie Smith, and Billie Holiday
(New York: Pantheon Books, 1998), 91-119.
Week 4 Critiques of Universalist, Androcentric
Epistemology
19 Sept.
-
Genevieve Lloyd, “The Man of Reason,” in Garry and Pearsall, eds., Women,
Knowledge, and Reality
-
Alison M. Jaggar, “Love and Knowledge: Emotion in Feminist Epistemology,”
in Garry and Pearsall, eds., Women, Knowledge, and Reality
-
Lorraine Code, “Taking Subjectivity into Account,” in Garry and Pearsall,
eds., Women, Knowledge, and Reality
First short paper due:
What are the major criticisms that feminists have levied
against universalistic, androcentric epistemologies? (5 pages)
Week 5 Feminism and Science
26 Sept.
-
Helen Longino, “Can There Be a Feminist Science?” in Garry and Pearsall,
eds., Women, Knowledge, and Reality
-
Lynn Hankinson Nelson, “Who Knows? What Can They Know? And When?” in Garry
and Pearsall, eds., Women, Knowledge, and Reality
-
Sandra Harding, “Feminism, Science, and the Anti-Enlightenment Critiques,”
in Garry and Pearsall, eds., Women, Knowledge, and Reality
-
Evelyn Fox Keller, “A World of Difference,” in Reflections on Gender
and Science (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985), 158-76.
Handout on feminist biographies
Week 6 Women’s Life Narratives
3 Oct.
-
Nell Irvin Painter, “Writing Biographies of Women,” Journal of Women’s
History 9, no. 2 (Summer 1997): 154-63.
-
Shirley J. Yee, “The Inventiveness and Inventedness of Identity Formation
in History and Literature,” Journal of Women’s History 10, no. 1
(Spring 1998): 174-82.
-
Victoria Bissell Brown, “Biography in the Mother Tongue,” Journal of
Women’s History 10, no. 2 (Summer 1998): 198-206.
-
Lourdes Torres, “The Construction of the Self in U.S. Latina Autobiographies,”
in Garry and Pearsall, eds., Women, Knowledge, and Reality
-
A children’s picture-book biography, early-reader biography, or chapters
from a young adult biography on a North American woman
Responses to biography handout due/Small group projects
Week 7 Feminist Standpoint Epistemology,
Pt. I
10 Oct.
-
Liz Stanley, “‘A Referral Was Made’: Behind the Scenes during the Creation
of a Social Services Department ‘Elderly’ Statistic,” in Feminist Praxis:
Research, Theory and Epistemology in Feminist Sociology, ed. Liz Stanley
(London: Routledge, 1990), 113-22.
-
Smith, The Everyday World as Problematic, pp. 1-104.
Second short paper due: 1) Drawing on Keller,
Painter, Yee, Brown, and Torres (where appropriate), as well as any
other relevant readings from the course (Davis, for example, might
prove useful, as might Lloyd or Jaggar), and 2) focusing on the
children’s biography you read for last week (or a different one,
if you prefer), 3) discuss how the woman who is the subject of the children’s
biography you read is constructed as knower and as known. How are your
sense of her and your way of knowing her shaped by such factors as selection
of details, proclaimed significance, identified historical context, interpretation
of evidence, use of images, organization, coherence, meta-narratives
(regarding quest, marriage, individualism, or nationalism, for example),
and simplification? (5-6 pages)
Week 8 Feminist Standpoint Epistemology,
Pt. II
17 Oct.
-
Smith, The Everyday World as Problematic, pp. 105-226.
-
Sherene H. Razack, “Storytelling for Social Change,” in Returning the
Gaze: Essays on Racism, Feminism and Politics, ed. Himani Bannerji
(Toronto, ON: Sister Vision Press, 1993), 83-100.
Week 9 Race and Feminist Epistemology
24 Oct.
-
Marilyn Frye, “White Woman Feminist,” in Willful Virgin: Essays in Feminism,
1976-1992 (Freedom, CA: Crossing Press, 1992), 147-69.
-
María Lugones, “Playfulness, ‘World’-Traveling, and Loving Perception,”
in Garry and Pearsall, eds., Women, Knowledge, and Reality
-
Collins, Fighting Words, pp. ix-76.
Week 10 Black Feminist Epistemologies
31 Oct:
-
Collins, Fighting Words, pp. 79-251
-
bell hooks, “Feminism and Black Women’s Studies,” SAGE 6, no. 1
(Summer 1989): 54-56.
Week 11 Divided Selves
7 Nov:
-
Charlotte Perkins Gilman, The Yellow Wallpaper (New York: Dover,
orig. 1892).
-
Susan Bordo, “Anorexia Nervosa: Pyschopathology as the Crystallization
of Culture,” in Garry and Pearsall, eds., Women, Knowledge, and Reality
-
Carol Gilligan, “Teaching Shakespeare’s Sister: Notes from the Underground
of Female Adolescence,” in Making Connections, ed. Carol Gilligan,
Nona P. Lyons, and Trudy J. Hanmer (Cambridge: Harvard University Press,
1990), 6-29.
Week 12 Researching Women’s Lives: Feminist
Research Methodologies
14 Nov:
-
Sofia Villenas, “The Colonizer/Colonized Chicana Ethnographer: Identity,
Marginalization, and Co-optation in the Field,” Harvard Educational
Review 66, no. 4 (Winter 1996): 711-31.
-
Dolores Delgado Bernal, “Using a Chicana Feminist Epistemology in Educational
Research,”
Harvard Educational Review 68, no. 4 (Winter 1998): 555-82.
-
Emily Honig, “Striking Lives: Oral History and the Politics of Memory,”
Journal
of Women’s History 9, no. 1 (Spring 1997): 139-57.
-
Irene Ledesma, “Confronting Class: Comment on Honig,” Journal of Women’s
History 9, no. 1 (Spring 1997): 158-63.
Guest speakers: Sofia Villenas and Dolores Delgado
Bernal
Week 13 Post-Structuralism and Feminist Epistemology
21 Nov:
-
Alessandra Tanesini, “Whose Language?” in Garry and Pearsall, eds.,
Women,
Knowledge, and Reality
-
Andrea Nye, “The Voice of the Serpent: French Feminism and the Philosophy
of Language,” in Garry and Pearsall, eds., Women, Knowledge, and Reality
-
Judith Butler, “Imitation and Gender Insubordination,” in Garry and Pearsall,
eds., Women, Knowledge, and Reality
Week 14 Post-Structural Feminist Pedagogies
28 Nov:
-
Bronwyn Davies, “The Sense Children Make of Feminist Stories,” in Frogs,
Snails and Feminist Tales: Preschool Children and Gender (Sydney,
Australia: Allen & Unwin, 1989), 43-69.
-
Valerie Walkerdine, “Femininity as Performance,” in Schoolgirl Fictions
(London: Verso, 1990), 133-46.
-
Mimi Orner, “Interrupting the Calls for Student Voice in ‘Liberatory’ Education:
A Feminist Poststructuralist Perspective,” in Feminisms and Critical
Pedagogy, ed. Carmen Luke and Jennifer Gore (New York: Routledge,
1992), 74-89.
Week 15 Feminist Pedagogies
5 Dec:
-
Barbara Blinick, “Out in the Curriculum, Out in the Classroom: Teaching
History and Organizing for Change,” in Tilting the Tower: Lesbians
Teaching Queer Subjects, ed. Linda Garber (New York: Routledge,
1994), 142-49.
-
Barbara Omolade, “A Black Feminist Pedagogy,” in The Rising Song of
African American Women (New York: Routledge, 1994), 129-36.
-
Audrey Thompson, “Caring in Context: The Educational Limitations
of Gender Difference Theory,” Curriculum Inquiry (in press).
Week 16
12 Dec.
No class meeting; final paper due (by 6 p.m.) in
lieu of exam. This paper should focus on the implications of feminist
epistemology for curriculum and pedagogy (or it may address some other topic,
if pre-arranged). (12-15 pages)